copyright 1995 by William E. Campbell http://www.webtrail.com/petbehavior/
Have you ever seen a device or a program designed
to correct a dog behaviour problem that explained howsmart
dogs are and how they think? Most plans or gadgets enable owners, literally,
to declare war on theirhapless pets.
Little or no concern is afforded to what the dogs happen to think about
them. In fact, the
implication is that dogs don't think at all
... either they just react to external stimuli like robots, or respondaccording
to genetically controlled "drives." Dogs are rarely credited with the ability
to solve a problemmentally; to analyse
a situation; imagine ways to manipulate or control it, then take a pre-planned
course of
action toward a goal that was preconceived
in the dog's mind. In short, the dog is considered a real dummy,then
treated like a dummy. But this concept is not correct. Dogs are smart.
They can, and usually do, thinkrings around
their owners. And they can do it because most owners have never learned
how to think like a
dog.
Understanding Non-Verbal Thinking
We all wonder now and then what our dog is
thinking. If we wonder aloud, perhaps when mealtime isapproaching
and the dog is looking expectantly at us, we might say something like,
"I'll bet Tippy's thinking,'When is my
dinner going to be ready?' " In all likelihood, Tippy isn't originating
any thoughts about 'when
dinner will be ready.' It is more likely
Tippy is imagining (or 'imaging' in his mind) the words and movementsyou
usually say and perform before getting his dinner; something like, "You
want dinner, Tippy?" All that tailwagging
and those pleading eyes are aimed at stimulating you to say it.
But, an inability to originate thoughts in
a spoken language does not make dogs unintelligent. Even peopledon't
actively think in a spoken language unless they actively 'speak' it. For
instance, during a short vacationto Japan,
if you don't already speak the language, you'll probably pick up the meaning
of a few words. After afew natives look
at you in the morning and say "Ohio," you may eventually learn that they're
not curiousabout where you're from, but
are wishing you a "Good Morning." Still, you won't think in Japanese unless
youlive there a few months and actively
speak it. Even a pet Akita will never learn to speak or think in the native
lingo because their voice boxes, tongues
and lips cannot formulate the sounds of Japanese ... or English, orFrench,
etc, etc. The limit of our dog's language-learning is the meaning of the
sounds of certain words.Luckily, dogs
are quick to learn the sounds that are important to them.
With this in mind, when Tippy is prodding us about serving dinner, we'd be wise to discard ideas aboutcomplete sentences being originated and thought about, and replace them with the non-language concept ofmental images. To illustrate this further; when most Tippys are asking for dinner they actually look fromtheir owners toward the place where it is served, generally the kitchen.
Evidence of Imagery
Some very convincing research suggests that dogs think in sensory impressions; visual, sound and odourimages, etc. This is not to say that they sit around on quiet days experiencing videos inside their brains.However, they likely share our ability to form and experience in their minds certain images, odours andsounds. The scientific basis for this idea came from Russia and was published in the US in 1973. A scientistname VS.. Rusinov1 was studying the electrophysiology of the brain and had several dogs wired with brainwave equipment and radio transmitters. When the dogs were brought into the lab from the kennels forexperimental conditioning tests, the electroencephalograph machine was turned on to record their brainwave patterns. This was done at the same time each day, five days a week. One weekend, purely by accident,Rusinov brought a group of visitors into the lab and turned on the EEG machine. Lo, the dog that wasnormally schedule for tests during the week at that time was sending wave forms nearly identical to hisregular working patterns! When the testing time passed, the dogs' brain waves soon returned to their normal'at rest' forms. I never found any mention by Rusinov as to whether the dogs out in the kennel were actuallyperforming their conditioned laboratory behaviourisms. Chances are they were not, but one thing is almostsure; compared to human experience in similar types of studies, the dogs were apparently experiencing themmentally2,3.
The late Polish scientist, Jerzi Konorski,3
taught dogs to salivate and expect food in their trays when a lightflickered.
This was done regularly every few minutes. However, after a few trials,
the dogs started salivatingand looking
at the trays as if the food were actually there, even though the light
had not flickered. Konorski
ventured that the dogs were hallucinating
about both the stimulus (the light) and the reward for salivating(the
food). One thing is sure: Something was going on in the dogs' minds that
made them behave as if theywere happening.
Some Human Examples
Before going on with dogs, let us consider
some facets of our own 'mind's eye,' as suggested by Konorski.Imagine
we have a date to meet a loved one at a busy restaurant. We get there on
time and sit at a table nearthe door.
Fifteen minutes go by, but no friend arrives. We begin to wonder if they
are coming at all. We start
watching people approach the door. Pretty
soon, people with similar features almost cause us to call out tothem.
The more concerned and anxious we become, the more apt we are to mistake
strangers for our friend.When he or she
finally arrives, the pleasure and relief we feel is often mixed with mild
displeasure. We are
ambivalent ... we have mixed emotions about
meeting them in the future.
Almost everyone has mental imagery. Often,
just the thought of a loved one conjures up their image. This canapply
to sounds, as well. Think about your favourite musical piece and your can
often hear it in your 'mind'sear.' These
are positive images. They are emotionally pleasant. At the other end of
the scale, recalling a
terrifying experience can not only create
its images, but sometime even make us shudder. This is an exampleof
negative, emotionally unpleasant images.
Back To Dogs
So it is with our dogs. When we are late getting
home, or if they over-miss us because we spoil them withattention
and petting every time they demand it, they very likely worry in images,
too. They may well recallimages of us
and our activities, such as fluffing the pillows on the sofa, putting away
record albums, handling
magazines and books, putting on shoes just
before leaving, sitting in a favourite armchair, etc. As a result ofthis,
they often engage in activities which involve them with these images: Pillows
wind up on the floor,albums or magazines
are moved or chewed, a chair seat gets dug up, shoes are brought out of
the closet. If
they can't have us there, they try to interact
with things that symbolize us.
If dogs really do store up and recall images of us and life's other objects and experiences, it follows that wemight use this to our mutual benefit. But since most owners do not understand how dogs think, this imageryis where the seeds of most behaviours problems are sown. Dogs receive and recall conflicting images of ownersand many important experiences.
The Puppy's Dilemma
Consider the new puppy whose owners come home
at regular times and join in an ecstatically joyful greetingceremony.
This imagery is quickly ingrained, and the pup begins to anticipate the
experience, just Konorski'sdogs hallucinated
about the flickering light and the food tray. However, as will happen in
even the most well
regulated household, one day the owner is
late. The puppy begins experiencing the images of his tardyowners
... starts fretting, pacing. Well primed energies, ready for the greeting
ceremony, demand an outlet asthe adrenaline
starts pumping.
What's going on in its mind's eye or ear?
It probably imagines hearing footsteps, perhaps even sees the dooropen...
which doesn't happen. But it should. This introduces conflict between what
it wants and expects andwhat is really
happening. Conflict creates frustration. Frustration produces anxiety,
which triggers an even
greater adrenaline rush. The pup searches
for something real to satisfy its desire to 'experience' the owner ...a
magazine or book it saw the owner reading recently. It is rich with the
owner's scent. If it cannot have theowner
there, it can at least have their genuine odour or taste. So it sniffs,
tastes, maybe even swallows parts of
the article. Naturally, this does not fully
substitute for the whole owner, so the puppy's social appetite is notreally
satisfied.
Finally, here comes the owner. The puppy innocently launches into its joyous, semi-hysterical ritual. Theowner starts to join in, but spies the pulverized magazine or book. What's this? Naturally, if not wisely, theowner angrily grabs the pup, drags it to the demolished object and scolds it, or slaps it's snout or rump, orboth. The pet's single-track mind is riveted on the owner. It yips, rolls over, or struggles vainly to escape.Punishment concluded, the owner angrily picks up the remnants of the article and storms to the trashbasket.
Psychic Trauma
The net result of this is a totally confused
pup with a conflicting set of images of its owner. This sort of shockto
the nervous system is called psychic trauma in both animals and humans.
A conflict has been instilledbetween
the positive image of the owner (happy Dr. Jekyll) and the negative (Mr.
Homecoming Hyde). This
creates frustration and anxiety about homecomings,
growing in severity if the scenario is repeated a fewtimes.
(It is interesting that in many cases, owners tell us that the pup was
fine for a day or so after the firstpunishment.
This may equate to the human experience of repression, in which memory
of the traumaticexperience is suppressed,
creating a sort of 'backwards amnesia.') Even when this occurs, since thepunishment
was not associated with the act of chewing up something, the puppy seeks
out another article,perhaps a shoe, and
the cycle is repeated until the total relationship between owner and dog
is tainted withemotional ambivalence.
Mixed feelings are eating away at the positive qualities of their relationship.
Negativeemotional impressions may start
to dominate it.
At about this stage, many owners conclude that the punishment may not have been severe enough. That'swhy the correction was not permanent. So they intensify it. The relationship erodes further as weeks go by.Enough of this cascading negative effect and the owner is ready take drastic action. The dog, nowhyper-sensitive to its owner's mood change, feels something is wrong. This often is reflected by newproblems, such as submissive wetting when the owner comes home or approaches the dog at other times; off-schedule bowel movements or urination occur, etc.
Many pets act insecure, currying more favour when the owner is home, and hence, missing the owner evenmore acutely when left alone. Frustration and anxiety build, while the isolation-related, tension-relievingbehaviour mounts. The unwitting owner, who originally may have thought the dog is 'getting even' for beingleft alone, begins to consider it incorrigible.
HELP!
This is when outside help is often sought.
A book is purchased. The veterinarian, breeder, pet shop, a traineror
behaviourist may be consulted. If lucky, the owner gets advice that brings
genuine insight into pet/ownerrelationships
and dog behaviour. But, more likely, they find traditional quick fixes
and the dog winds up in a
desensitisation program; gets dosed with
anxiety relieving drugs or barbiturates; is stuck in a cramped crateor
cage all day, or banned to the yard or garage, or has its mouth stuffed
with chewed debris and taped shutfor
hours. Since none of these approaches deal with the causes, the 'thinking
dog' and the total relationship
with its owners and the environment, success
is rare. The majority of these formerly precious pets findthemselves
rejected ... relegated to the local pound for five to seven days, where
the odds are 3-to-2 they'llsuffer society's
'ultimate solution'. But things don't have to be so grim, if the owners
learn some 'dog think.'
Applying Positive Imagery To Solve 'Separation Anxiety'
Dogs that misbehave when they are left alone are said to be suffering from separation anxiety. The term is aneat buzz-phrase; almost everybody uses it. It sounds professional. The trouble is, as a transplant fromhuman psychiatry, it really doesn't convey much useful information. However, the term is here, so we'll use itin its broadest sense, which is; "a troubled feeling when left alone or apart from a certain person or persons."This allows us to recommend a remedial behavioural program that deals with the realities of the dog's totalrelationships. First, however, we must be sure that the dog's veterinarian has ruled out the manyphysical/medical causes for anxiety, such as thyrotoxicosis, hyperthyroidism, pre-diabetes, encephalitis,allergies, hyperkinesis, etc. etc.
The Program
Dogs that are unduly upset when left alone
usually enjoy their owner's attention and petting whenever theyask
for (or demand it) when the people are at home. To apply the imagery concept
to this relationship, wecould say the
dog 'sees itself' as directing, or leading the owner. When it wants some
petting, it nudges or
otherwise stimulates the owner, and the owner
complies. The dog wants out, whines at the door or at theowner,
and the door gets opened. Mealtime approaches, dog whines and prances,
and dinner gets served.When the owner
goes from room to room, the dog is either ahead, leading them, or close
behind. This is the
reality of their relationship, at least in
the dog's mind. But, when the owner leaves, against the dog's wishes,the
pet is predictably upset, and problem behaviour occurs. This can involve
barking, chewing, pacing,self-mutilation,
off-schedule bowel movements, urination around the house, etc.
The leadership problem can be turned about
by presenting a different reality to the dog; one in which the dogis
pleasantly, but firmly and consistently told to perform some simple act,
such as 'sit' whenever it attemptsto
gain attention or affection, or whenever the owner wants to give the dog
some attention. All 'sits', or
whatever command is used ('down' is a good
one for highly bossy dogs) are praised happily as 3 to 5 secondsof
petting is awarded; then the dog is cheerfully released with an "OK" or
"Free." (Free is a good releasebecause
OK is too common a word.)
If a really bossy dog refuses to obey, and many do when they realize their relationship is being turnedaround, simply ignore the situation, turn away and go on about some other activity, ignoring the dog. Somedogs have refused to respond for as long as four days before coming to terms with a follower relationship.However long it takes, after a few days the dog's image of itself seems to evolve from one of giving directionto taking it with compliance prior to being petted, getting dinner, going out the door, getting on the couch, etc.
In moving around the house, whenever the dog forges ahead, simply about-turn and go the other way. Thismust be repeated until the dog walks patiently behind or, better yet, doesn't even follow. It is also helpful,but not vital, to practice down-stays of increasing length during several evenings a week.
Images of Hyper-Emotionality
Most 'home alone' problem dogs get extremely
emotional when their owners get home; some even getexcitable
when regular departure times approach. To supplant these emotionally over-stimulating
images, sitquietly for about five minutes
before leaving, in the area where the dog will be left. No eye contact
or
speaking is allowed. Then, get up and go
without looking at or speaking to the pet.At
homecoming, enter quietly and ignore the dog until it quiets down completely.
Then it is greeted happily,but briefly,
away from the door of arrival. This subdued routine soon replaces the dog's
highly emotionalmental images of returns
and departures with calmness and serenity.
Here's the tough part for most all dog owners:
When coming home the place is a mess! Pillows have beenchewed,
or the chair is tattered again, or a pile of poop graces the doorway, or
some other problem is evident.If we keep
in mind that the dog has in the past suffered from conflicting images at
homecoming, it is
imperative that no emotion, or even attention,
should be directed at the remnants of the problem; such aschewed
up magazines, shoes, defecation, etc. Instead, after five minutes of ignoring
the dog, it should begreeted away from
the scene of the misbehaviour, and then pleasantly taken outdoors or to
another room and
left alone while the mess is cleaned up.
This avoids creating new (or reinforcing old) conflicting images ofemotional
reactions to, or interactions with, the debris, defecation, etc.
I have always called this 'the secret clean-up'.
It has worked wonders as part of programs ranging fromdigging
in the yard to housetraining puppies. Just why it is such an effective
adjunct to correction programsremains
to be satisfactorily explained. In the meantime, we'll have to say that
the lack of an image of the
owner and the mess is more beneficial to
correction than is the image.
The Big Picture
So, there it is. Dogs think in images and
we can mould and change their behaviour in hundreds of ways if we willthink
as they do. For instance, on the negative side, a set up whereby a car
screeches to a stop, horn blaring,just
as a dog starts toward the street from the sidewalk, then praising its
retreat, is a valuable exercise in
negative imagery. However, it must be repeated
until the dog avoids the street when cars are not present, aswell.
Teaching the 'panic' command to come needs the dog's name followed by a code word, a sound image that isexclusive to coming when it is absolutely necessary, and praise words or a vocal rhythm that is unique to thatcommand, coupled with fast hand-clapping while taking a crouched position. These combined, positive imagescan create a dog that will dependably respond to your code word and come to your praise. It is especiallyimportant to teach this command when the dog is out of sight, as well.