Muscle Injuries: Contusions, Strains, Contractures,

Myositis Ossificans and Compartment Syndrome in the Dog

Randall B. Fitch, DVM, MS; Ronald D. Montgomery, DVM, MS; Michael H. Jaffe, DVM

Injuries and disorders of muscle are a diagnostic challenge requiring careful, thorough orthopedic examination. Traumatic muscle injury includes contusion, strain, contractures, myositis ossificans and compartment syndrome (pressure injury). Wider recognition and treatment of these conditions will benefit many of these patients.

Reference: Fitch RB, Montgomery RD. Jaffe MH. Muscle Injuries in Dogs. The Compendium on Continuing Education. 19(8): 947-958, 1997

Key Points

Muscle injuries present a diagnostic challenge. The true prevalence in dogs is unknown, but is probably underestimated. Skeletal muscle constitutes approximately 50% of the total body mass in the dog. However, only five percent of referred musculoskeletal cases were reported to be muscle disorders with traumatic muscle injuries accounting for less than 1% of cases. In contrast, traumatic muscle injuries are considered to be the most common musculoskeletal disorder in humans. The lower frequency of recorded muscle injuries in dogs and cats may be due to failure to report these injuries, failure to diagnose these injuries when they accompany more apparent or severe injuries, and the difficulty of diagnosis. A large number of lameness cases remain undiagnosed, many are likely muscle associated. Wider recognition of muscle injuries will aid the veterinarian in evaluation of the lame dog.

Mechanisms of Muscle Injury and Repair

Muscle Contusion Muscle strains Table 1. Muscle Strain Injuries (from proximal to distal)
 
Forelimb Hindlimb
rhomboideus
iliopsoas
serratus ventralis
tensor fascia lata
pectorals
sartorius
triceps
pectineus
biceps
gracilis
flexor carpi ulnaris muscles
Achilles Mechanism
Muscle Contractures
 
Contractures and fibrotic myopathies
 
Infraspinatus contracture 
Quadriceps contracture 
Gracilis contracture 
Supraspinatus contracture 
Fibrotic myopathy (semitendinosus muscle)

Infraspinatus contracture

Quadriceps muscle contracture
Gracilis muscle contracture Fibrotic myopathy of the semitendinosus muscle Myositis ossificans

Heterotopic bone formation in muscle. The localized form has been described in several locations in the dog including muscles of the caudal hip region, shoulder, quadriceps and the cervical musculature.

Large, middle-aged, active dogs are most commonly affected. This condition is believed to occur secondary to trauma. Doberman pinschers with von Willebrand’s factor deficiencies were over-represented in early reports, although recent reports have described other breeds of dogs.

Mineralization does not always produce lameness or palpable discomfort. Bilateral mineralization was present radiographically in nearly half of the cases presented with unilateral lameness for dogs with myositis ossificans of the supraspinatus muscle. Lameness is believed to result from mechanical interference caused by the mineralized mass, therefore the size and location of the mineralization plays an important role in the severity of lameness.

Superficial mineralization of the supraspinatus muscle appears to cause little discomfort or lameness. In contrast, mineralization deep in the supraspinatus muscle caused greater lameness, which is believed due to mechanical interference with the biceps tendon. Biceps tenosynovitis has also been reported in association with myositis ossificans, therefore thorough evaluation of the biceps tendon is essential and may affect treatment and outcome.

Surgically debulking the mineralized mass is the preferred treatment since this lameness is not responsive to systemic antiinflammatory drugs or local steroid injections. Surgically debulking the mass resolves the discomfort and lameness in most cases. Complete excision of the mineralized mass is not necessarily required for resolution of lameness, although recurrence and continued lameness are a risk with incomplete excision. Both tendon splitting and tendon elevation (retraction) methods for approaching the mineralized mass in the supraspinatus muscle have been described, complete excision can be provided with either approach, but the tendon elevation approach may be less traumatic. Post-operative radiographs can assist in the evaluation of the completeness of the mass removal.

Compartment Syndrome

Conclusion

The ability to detect and diagnose muscle injury requires awareness of these injuries and high reliance on clinical orthopedic examination. Palpation of specific muscles combined with stressing the muscle through flexion and extension of the associated joints should improve the frequency of accurate diagnosis.

Although bilateral conditions may exist, many are unilateral allowing the veterinarian to compare normal position, size, and conformation with the unaffected side.

Palpable discomfort appears to be the most common clinical finding in muscle injuries, but swelling, muscle disruption and subcutaneous hemorrhage may be present. Confirmation of the diagnosis via radiography is limited in many of these conditions, but essential to rule-out osseous disorders.

Myopathies, which are characterized by generalized muscle changes (weakness, exercise intolerance, and gait changes), can be quite localized and confused with muscle injury.

Ultrasound, nerve and muscle biopsy, and electrodiagnostics are useful ancillary diagnostic tools.

Appropriate identification and treatment of muscle injuries can reduce scar tissue formation and help restore normal function to the muscle, with less potential for re-injury or chronic disability.